There are three forms of capital that shape a creator’s path to success. Money is only one of them.
Last weekend, I got on stage to share what I’ve learned about the economics of creator businesses to journalist attendees at the Pulitzer Center’s annual conference in D.C.
I’ve sharpened and built on those thoughts for today’s newsletter.
— Natalia Pérez-González, Assistant Editor
Turn this season’s traffic into lasting revenue
Could this upcoming wave of visitors be the turning point for your income? U.S. agencies rate Google up to 6x higher than the competitor average for delivering high conversion rates — meaning advertisers are actively looking for high-quality seasonal content where readers are ready to act.
Holiday content helps readers decide what to make, buy, and book. Think:
Easy DIY Halloween decorations & costumes
Thanksgiving & Christmas batch-cooking recipes
Curated tech & lifestyle gift guides
Budget-friendly holiday travel tips
Those readers are arriving ready to act, making your seasonal content a valuable place for advertisers to reach them.
Tap into the year’s highest ad demand before your holiday traffic peak passes.
This is an advertisement.
What makes you, as a creator, expensive?
Who can afford to be a creator?
Anyone, in theory, can build an audience and start producing content. But the economics of becoming a creator depend heavily on what you bring into the business before it earns its first dollar. The assets that make you most valuable — your network, your expertise, your skillset — are often the most expensive to acquire.
I spent last Saturday in Washington, D.C. with 30–40 fellows at the Pulitzer Center’s annual conference, where emerging journalists from universities across the country gathered to share their reporting on under-covered issues and learn from industry veterans and other professionals.
It was a full-circle moment for me. Four years ago, I'd sat where they were, preparing to present the findings of a journalism project I'd poured nine months of my life into.
I knew I didn't quite fit the traditional mold of a journalist back then. I loved reporting, but I was also drawn to the more community-oriented, personality-driven corners of the internet, where storytelling took different forms in people building audiences around their interests, expertise, and perspectives.
I didn't know what a career combining those things could look like, and at the time, the industry wasn't exactly encouraging journalists to find out.
This was 2021, I was starting graduate school, and the idea of a journalist cultivating a personal brand could still provoke a major argument about professional credibility and ethics. Taylor Lorenz, then an internet culture reporter at The New York Times, was among the most visible journalists building public identities that extended beyond their bylines.
She was beginning to build a following that rivaled those of the influencers she covered. In 2022, after leaving the paper for The Washington Post, she argued that journalists needed to build audiences of their own rather than depend on the institutions employing them. The comments sparked a days-long argument on Twitter, with fellow journalists questioning whether building a personal brand was becoming more important than doing the reporting itself.
Now, in 2026, I was back at this conference, this time after writing dozens and dozens of profiles on creators building sustainable businesses. Some were journalists, others had backgrounds in entirely different industries, but their experiences had given me a much clearer picture of what it actually takes to make a living independently. I was there to share what I'd learned, and what the fellows could take from it as they considered their own careers.
But as we spoke about all these possibilities, we kept coming back to questions about access:
Who really gets to pursue these opportunities?
How do they find or build the support systems?
Who can afford to stick around long enough to see them pay off?
Money is an obvious part of the equation, but hardly the only currency that matters. The cost of publishing has never been lower; the cost of building something that lasts is another story.
All journalists are skilled purveyors and disseminators of information, but one with a decade of industry connections has a different starting point from someone fresh out of college.

I presented these advantages to them as three kinds of capital: social capital, intellectual capital, and economic capital. Each shapes what a creator can build, how quickly they can grow (and how durable their business will be), and how much risk they can afford to take.
Social capital — the relationships, reputation, and access that make it easier to get noticed; all things that directly affect your reach. Your personal brand, professional network, audience trust, and insider access.
Intellectual capital — the knowledge, skills, and original material that make your work worth consuming. Your expertise, reporting and research skills, creative and production skills, and intellectual property.
Economic capital — what you can afford to risk; the resources that allow creators to invest in work before it generates income. This is your savings and financial runway, equipment and infrastructure, safety nets (a partner or familial support), investment capacity, and any overhead costs.
Someone with strong social capital might secure a paying sponsor or investor before building a product (take next week’s Spotlight guest, Tayla Cannon, who secured a $1.1 million investment for a software she hadn’t even launched, because she had enough audience interest and support).
Someone else with exceptional intellectual capital might attract valuable customers without posting every day, and others with economic capital can hire help, effectively buying back time to invest in developing skills and relationships they don't yet possess.
The creator economy rewards the ability to convert one kind of capital into another, but those conversions aren't automatic, and they don't happen on the same timeline for everyone.
When telling journalists — or any aspiring creators — they can build their own media businesses, I wanted to also be honest about what it takes to get one off the ground, what resources they might need, and what risks they're being asked to assume.

Building social capital
Your network can be a distribution channel, a source of credibility, and eventually, a customer base.
Kyle Poyar, a software pricing expert, spent four years writing his newsletter, Growth Unhinged, without earning a single cent. His venture capital employer barred him from monetizing it, so he focused, instead, on building an audience through LinkedIn. When he finally tested advertising, would-be sponsors had been circling for years. The first company he sent rates to bought more than $100,000 in inventory without even asking for a call.
LinkedIn is still at the top of Kyle’s newsletter growth funnel. In a newsletter issue he published last year — cheekily titled "LinkedIn isn't over, you're just bad at it" — he laid out the playbook behind a platform following that's grown to 110,000, with 14 million impressions in a year.
Borrow trust before buying reach: Find people whose audiences overlap with yours and give them a reason to introduce you. Kyle traded guest bylines and cross-promotions with other writers, and each swap brought him engaged readers who converted far better than paid reach.
Treat your network as distribution: When Kyle launched Growth Unhinged, his LinkedIn and Twitter followings pushed it to about 2,000 subscribers within weeks. Kyle's first major advertiser didn't need convincing that he could reach the right audience. The relationship, and the evidence of his credibility, had already done much of the selling.
Make yourself useful before you need something: Kyle’s LinkedIn playbook starts in other people’s comment sections. He joins relevant conversations before publishing his own posts, so the people he eventually wants to reach are already familiar with him and his work.

Building intellectual capital
Sophia Smith Galer, a former BBC video journalist and Vice senior reporter, built her career on the balance between authentic presentation and editorial rigor.
She was making vertical explainers on TikTok before most British journalists were trying, carried the same skills to Instagram when it launched Reels, and now runs a consultancy that teaches newsrooms and experts to do the same.
What started as a reporting skill became a specialization, then a business. Her playbook offers three lessons:
Use your body of work as a knowledge base: Every assignment, experiment, and published piece is an opportunity to learn something you can eventually sell (and research for someone else to build on). Sophia turned years of short-form experience into consulting retainers and workshops. Then, after surveying more than 100 journalists in her trainings, she used those insights to develop Sophiana, an app that helps turn articles into video hooks and scripts. The work she was already doing became market research for her next business.
Focus on a core content niche: Being a good journalist is a skill. Being the journalist who knows how to make rigorous reporting work in a 60-second video is an even more distinctive proposition. Sophia's specialization gave people a reason to seek her out, and eventually, a reason to pay her. Look for the intersection of what you're unusually good at, what your audience needs, and what other people haven't quite figured out.
Build expertise that can survive a platform shift: Sophia's early advantage came from understanding TikTok, but her business isn't dependent on TikTok staying relevant. The underlying skill — translating complicated information into compelling short-form storytelling — works across platforms. Learn the mechanics of distribution, certainly, but invest more heavily in the skills that remain valuable when the algorithm, format, or audience moves elsewhere.

Taking inventory of financial capital
Economic capital is an hourglass.
Savings, a partner's income, or a well-timed severance check can buy you months, maybe years, to figure things out before the business needs to be self-sustaining.
Liz Kelly Nelson, a former VP of strategy and operations at Vox, left in November 2023 to launch Project C, which helps journalists go independent. Her advice is to plan the leap the way an executive builds revenue projections, starting with the numbers:
Start with your financial foundation: Start with your monthly living and business expenses, then determine how many months you could cover without creator income. If you need $2,500 a month to live, six months of personal runway alone means $15,000 in savings.
Work backward from your income target: A $60,000 annual revenue goal translates to $15,000 per quarter or $5,000 per month. But revenue isn't take-home pay. Factor in taxes, operating costs, and the time it will take to reach that number. This gives you specific, approachable benchmarks to work against.
Match your revenue model to your existing advantages: A journalist with deep industry expertise (intellectual capital) might find consulting or speaking more immediately lucrative than subscriptions. Someone with an engaged niche audience (social capital) may have a stronger case for sponsorships or paid products. Start with the assets you can monetize most credibly, rather than trying every model at once.
Diversify across multiple “income baskets”: Build 3-4 revenue streams simultaneously — subscriptions, sponsorships, consulting, digital products. When one basket underperforms, the others keep you afloat.






